What Wars Are; What They Are Not

A visit to the The Rain Maker, the blog of fellow Igorot Daniel Ted, inspires this piece today. His most recent post deals with war and peace.

My young Igorot American friend, Mark Leo is into a relentless campaign against the US- Iraq or any US-led war, or any war for that matter. In Bibaknets, a discussion forum of Igorots worldwide, he called everyone's attention to the plight of Pat Tillman. Tillman was a casualty of the US-led war versus Afghanistan. A professional football player, he gave up his sports career and enlisted in the United Stat,s army. He was joined by his brother Kevin. He must have believed that something good would come out of the US-led wars that he abandoned a lucrative profession. Others evaded the draft; this guy, however, sought it.

But Pat Tillman died in the war he believed in, sadly not as a hero but as a victim. His death was reported as the result of hostile fire or fire coming from the enemy. Perhaps due to his stature, his death generated a lot of publicity. Questions went beyond the surface until the Pentagon had to admit that he was killed by friendly fire. In harsher terms, he was killed by his own country, the country he went to serve in the battlefields of Afghanistan.

But let us go beyond Pat Tillman and the others who died in Operation Enduring Freedom which is America's military response to the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. Filipino-American soldiers died in the US-led wars, too. The latest casualties of the Iraq war include Michael E. Tayaotao from California. His parents are from the Mountain Province, Philippines. You can read about him in Bill Bilig's From The Boondocks. So the tragedy is very real to us.

And, as though dying from a bullet fired by an assassin who might as well be one of us, we ask Richard North Patterson's Private Screening martyr James Kilcannon's question before he gave up the ghost: "Such a joke. But what does it mean?"

For Pat Tillman, I wrote some lines which I posted in 2006 in American blogs opposed to war:


Who Wins a War?

(to the memory of Pat Tillman)

Who will win the US-Iraq war? Who wins a war?
Does body count demarcate triumph from defeat?
Who won World War I? Who won World War II?

Who wins when limbs and torsos fly in the air?
Who wins when blood squirts profusely from the
belly of a baby who has no name yet,
hit by a stray bullet a day after its birth?
Who wins when civilians are maimed forever
to exist lifeless in the land of the living,
a merciless fate worse than death?
Who wins when a passer-by's brain explodes
while he is ruminating his son's future?
Who wins when women are raped to weaken foes?
Who wins when an entire village is reduced to
nothingness even ghosts cannot survive?

Victory in war is a tall tale, a gory monster tale.

Victory is mindless and random destruction.
Victory is food shortage, hunger, deprivation.
Victory is death, murder, genocide, ethnocide.
Victory is the massacre of innocent people.
Victory is orphaned defenseless boys and girls.
Victory is mothers and widows with broken hearts.
Victory is robbery of the dreams and future of
men and women who barely graduated
from the crib, compelled to render
military service to fight a senseless war.
Victory is the remorseless sacrifice of soldiers
like Pat Tillman in the cold, cold altar of
unquenchable thirst for power and gold.
Victory is recurrent nightmare for soldiers forced
to pull the trigger on fellow human beings.

Victory in war is the big, big lie always passed on
as the big, big truth that it is not.
Victory in war is the big, big truth seldom told as
the big, big lie that it is.

The only truth is defeat and material accumulation
for the manufacturers of death machines.
There are no winners, only losers and profiteers and
eternal curse for those who gain from the
tragedy of the human race, and the seed
of their loins up to the third generation.

Why do governments assign huge budgets
for firearms and death machines in the name
of peace, when peace is nothing but a stomach
that does not grumble from hunger and want?

If peace is the absence of war, why go to war
to have peace?

If peace is the presence of justice, why should it
be achieved through an innately unjust means?

Must we have wars at all? Must we live a lie?
Must we have wars at all? Must we live a lie?

-Cheryl L. Daytec, 22 October 06

26 comments:

bananas said...

tulad ng sabi kay daniel ted, naniniwala ako sa digmaan para sa hustisya.

ang paglulunsad ng gyera para kapangyarihan ay kawalan ng hustisya.

...
digmaan para sa hustisya

CHERYL L. DAYTEC said...

Hi, Bananas.

Revolution, to me, is not war.

Digmaan para sa hustisya!

Salamat sa pagbisita.

Anonymous said...

I dont think we'll be hearing the end of this war for a long time though.
-Mark

CHERYL L. DAYTEC said...

Mark, nice of you to drop by.

I just finished reading Michael Moore's "Dude, Where's My Country?" Hilarious and enlightening. While that son-of-a-gun remains your President, the war won't be over. In fact, new ones will be launched.

God bless us all.

The Rainmaker said...

Damn, it feels great to be an inspiration. I feel like I'm the "coolest guy" already...hehe. War is a very sensitive and rather super-complicated subject to talk about. People have different views about whether it's beneficial to peace or it simply just takes us farther away from it. I think it's both. There are times war is the solution but there are also times war just makes it worse.

The Rainmaker said...

I loved the poem, by the way. It's thrilling.

Anonymous said...

Whoa there, Chyt, how did you do that?

Agree- revolution is not war.

CHERYL L. DAYTEC said...

Hi, Daniel and The Judge.

War has come to be associated with greed for power and wealth that I see nothing good that comes from it. The wars launched by the Bushes of America were aimed at controlling the world's resources at the expense of other states.

When the oppressed masses rise up in arms to topple down exploitative bourgeoise structures masquerading as democractic governments (shamefully although they are dictatorial in essence) and install a democracy ruled by the proletariat, I would not consider that war. That would be revolution.

Bananas' "digmaan para hustisya" does not sound like war to me.

No to war!

admindude said...

Yay! The anti-war movement catching on. Sali ako. If the Bushes really believe in the wars they are waging, then they should send their kids to fight. Eh most of these "warlords" are nothing but cowards who would not risk their lives or the lives of their kin for the stupid wars they are creating.

CHERYL L. DAYTEC said...

Bill, right you are! The Bush twins are so cloistered in the White House, safe from the evils wrought by their brat of a Dad. At least to their credit, the children of Princess Diana wanted to go to Iraq, the lack of wisdom in their decision notwithstanding.

The combination of George W Bush and Dick Cheney is really a disaster for the world. That is even an understatement.

By the way, I recommend that you watch the documentary "Why We Fight." It shows Bush and Cheney at their worst or most evil.

Anonymous said...

Ma'am, pinipilit po naming talagang maging smart para maintindihan namin lahat poems ninyo. Mahirap pala pag wala kang poetic literacy. Pero pag naiintindihan pala ang isang usapin, madali ring intindihin ang tula. Kagaya nitong war poem. Nagdidiskasyon po kami about your poems.

Nakita po namin kayo nung pumunta kayo sa SLU this week. Ma'am, bakit wala na po yung long hair ninyo? Sayang po pero beauty pa rin po kayo.

Sinabi sa amin ni Sir Alangwawi na end of this month pa ang balik ninyo. Haay, ang tagal. Miss na po namin ang kabadingan ninyo. Mas dadali ang pag intindi namin ng Local Government Code.

Lagi po naming binibisita ang blog nyo. Nakakaintimidate lang po magcomment.

bananas said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
bananas said...

i admire chyt's points and i know, i can be politically incorrect here.

however, elementarizing something like war would end us up comfronted by its ugliness in all forms. to me, war is war and no matter how we euphemize it, it still is. and no matter how we put the word "humanizing" before it, war is still dehumanizing people. period.

u said that nothing good comes out of war, which you defined as something "associated with greed for power and wealth." well, i disagree.

im pretty sure you are not alien to the reality of "structural violence" and how this silent but obvious difference makes people wage war or revolution. that is more than good: that is beautiful.

because of class war, revolution is conceived. because someone is trying to accumulate too much power by "powerless-sing" the poor, the almost powerless poor consolidates their remaining power enough for them to wage war. and that is revolution.



i definitely say no to the war of bush against iraq.

i have seen the repercussions of the Philippine-government war against the Moro Islamic Liberation Front in Mindanao in 2003--the all-out-war version of GMA after her predecessor waged the same in 2000. For how can i agree with that?

now, we are all witnesses to the war waged against militants and journalists and even the common people whose being killed, left and right, and no one's being punished.


sorry, this is a very long comment already. c(@_@)a

CHERYL L. DAYTEC said...

SLU's Smart Students. Hoy, mga estudyante kong bading, tsinitsimis at nilalait ninyo ako sa sariling kong blog. X&@#! Email me at chytdaytec@gmail.com if you have some tsismak to share. Do not shortchange me. Full details, mga mahal kong naghihirap magpaka-Smart.

Seriously, I will be back before the semester ends. Keep studying. Be good to your professors.

CHERYL L. DAYTEC said...

Hi, Bananas. I think we are not really disagreeing. It is just that I do not like to use the word war to refer to class struggle. Your "digmaan para sa hustisya" (beautifully put, ha?) is from my vantage point a revolution. I go for revolution and even advocate it. I do not consider it war. But right you are, a rose called by any other name will smell just the same. OK then,I will concede but can we use the modifier "enlightened" to a digmaan para sa hustisya (Enlightened War. O, di ba, parang di violent ang arrive? ) as opposed to "just any war?"

Thanks for dropping by again.

Galing ng blog mo, ah.

CHERYL L. DAYTEC said...

Bananas, pahabol pa. I have a student who said that Karl Marx himself may have secretly indorsed capitalism because he knew it was its own evil and it was this evil that would bring about class struggle. In a way, then, something good could come out of the capitalism (and the structural violence innate in its character) he disdained - it foments the revolution that will finally lead to the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat.

bananas said...

chyt,



wink...wink...







tuloy-tuloy lang. walang tigil kahit pa man sa pamamahinga.

Anonymous said...

Wars of any kind only inflicts personal miseries, long lasting pains, and lots of griefs.
After attending the funeral services of Michael E. Tayaotao in California on August 24th, thought it was the worst I've seen, being buried next to his younger brother Vincent in less than a year's time.
After a week, I visited a close Baguio friend in his house with other friends and told them what I've just gone thru. My Baguio friend intimated to us, that during the Vietnam War, he actually witnessed three young brothers died on same day and brought back to America while their parents were waiting. I was stunned. Imagine for a moment being a parent of those three young soldiers.....being buried at the same time......

CHERYL L. DAYTEC said...

Bananas, wink, wink.

TruBlue, it is even possible that those three boys were drafted against their will. Theirs is a tragedy words cannot capture. Love owes grief so much.

Anonymous said...

It seems we havent heard the last from you and Mark about the Iraq war. I thought you said in your latest post in Bibaknets that you leave it to Mark and others to worry about the Iraq war and you will concentrate on getting well. Hehe. When I read that I said, "Hmmm, let us see." I am vindicated.

Keep it up, Chyt. NO to wars!

CHERYL L. DAYTEC said...

Anonymous,

Did I say that? :-)

Keep visiting. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

“We are the advocates of the abolition of war,
We don’t want war
But war can only be abolished through war
And in order to get rid of the gun,
It is necessary to take up arms..”-Chairman Mao

What Bananas and Chyt mean? Bananas calls it "Digmaan para sa hustisya" and Chyt calls it revolution.

-MUC

CHERYL L. DAYTEC said...

Anonymous MUC, the wars launched in the name of lust for power, for me, have taken away anything good from the word "war." Hence, I am always careful to avoid the word when I mean revolution, and ask my students to do the same.

Mao also said: War is politics the with blooshed, but politics is war without bloodshed.

Thanks for the visit, MUC.

Unknown said...

I like your blog - contents are great. Thanks.

Unknown said...

Ooops, I meant to sign up as Manila Bay Watch but was in the middle of posting in Hillblogger hence, the ID.

CHERYL L. DAYTEC said...

Hillblogger and Manila Bay Watch are one person? I thought Hillblogger was a European.

Thanks. Your Manila Bay Watch is remarkable. It is so socio-politically involved. I recommend it highly.