It was another bad week for the Philippines. The Supreme Court
just strengthened the culture of impunity pervading The Queendom by expanding the scope of executive privilege.
This is in relation to the Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership Agreement (JPEPA) signed in 2006 but still awaiting ratification by the Philippine Senate. The long and short of this agreement is this: It will make the Philippines the trash can of Japan. OK, let us grant that there are perks for the Philippines. But still, a trash can is a trash can. No Japan-made perfume can annihilate the stench of garbage. No Japan-made chemical can purify polluted air. No Japanese technology can reverse death from cancer or other illnesses that come from garbage. Jobs are good but we need life first. And hey, here in Baguio City, our garbage problem has reached unmanageable proportions and we are panicking. How can this country host Japanese garbage?
Now, the Supreme Court dominated by The Queen's political appointees said that the Filipino people need not know what transpired during the treaty negotiations. Senators should wonder about how they will ratify a treaty the full import of which eludes them.
The Queen must be grinning from ear to ear. And why not? She has a blanket she can use at will to block the public's vision range.
We are still smarting from disappointment over the March 2008 Supreme Court decision upholding Romulo "The Poodle" Neri's right to invoke executive privilege, a shield to dodge questions from the Senators investigating the mega-anomalous ZTE Broadband Deal. It is a really shocking deal not only for the overprice and bribes, but more because The Queen knew about them all along and because the First Gentleman appears to be the head of the syndicate to rob the Filipinos big time! With the Neri decision, The Queen can fill her hamper to the brim with very, very soiled laundry, wash it within walls immured from the public eye and come out clean as though her hands did not touch dirt. With this decision on the JPEPA, she can cook a recipe laced with poison without having to divulge the ingredients to the forced eaters. Barraged with queries, she can just shrug her shoulders and say, "Secret of the trade, folks!"
Let me summarize in blunt terms what the Supreme Court said in its Neri and JPEPA decisons: "The Queen and the queensmen do not owe anyone the truth!" Not even if the truth will set us free from tyranny.
During the dark years of Martial Law, the Supreme Court remained a bastion of truth and justice, although there were intermittent confused intervals. Now, it is an instrument of the reign of terror. I have never been disappointed in The Queen because she never had my trust and confidence to begin with. But the Supreme Court, having arrogated unto itself the role of sentinel of The Queen's dirty little secrets, is breaking my heart into tiny pieces.
Quo vadis, Philippines?
xx---------xx
Here is a poem I wrote a few years ago about justice.
Sun and Truth
The sun we know is always up
When day is day and night is out
Progress, on its power depends
Life to the grass and bees, it lends
It makes the flowers bloom so fair
The earth looks like true beauty’s lair
Behold the orange euphorbia
And the bright pink bougainvillea
But sometimes I get disillusioned
Even the day loses vision
When the thick clouds spread their white doom
The sun retreats to its dark room
Just as the truth is its own power,
Under its watch the kings quiver
Truth they say always sets us free
It protects, leaves innocence be
But when gold throws some confusion
Truth projects the face of fiction
Just as the clouds cover the sun
The weight of gold can push truth down
The courts of justice can be tools
To make truth lovers look like fools
Falsehood becomes justice’s anchor
Truth weeps slowly and leaves the door
Do not fully trust the absolute
Like the sun’s power and the truth.
7 comments:
I am uploading the comments I received in my Facebook account:
Trixie Cruz-Angeles wrote
at 7:45pm yesterday
The JPEPA must also be read in light of the pervading food crises. The Philippines will now become a primary food producer, not for its own people, but for Japan. Other more anomalous effects of this insiduous treaty makes a mockery of the term "agreement" even more so now that the executive need not divulge what else they had baragained away.
Delete
Cheryl Chyt Daytec wrote
at 8:14pm yesterday
Yes and more. The garbage dimension sinks into the Baguio people. Our garbage in this cleanest and greenest city has not been collected for almost a week. Reason- there is no dumpsite! Flies are swarming all over and the central business district really stinks. Arrrg!
Neoliberalism is really pushing us deeper into the darkest and stinkiest of pits where we languish, hungry for a morsel of rice. And it is happening in this agrarian country.
Delete
Trixie Cruz-Angeles wrote
at 8:58pm yesterday
Irony of ironies. Agrarian and hungry.
Delete
Cheryl Chyt Daytec wrote
at 9:24pm yesterday
Gloria resign! Down with neoliberalism and its masters and slaves!
Do not trust Gloria. Gloria out na!
I am reproducing what Atty. Chris Donaal wrote on my Facebook Wall:
Chris Donaal wrote:
"Just as the truth is its own power,
Under its watch the kings quiver
Truth they say always sets us free
It protects, leaves innocence be
But when gold throws some confusion
Truth projects the face of fiction
Just as the clouds cover the sun
The weight of gold can push truth down"
How eloquently said......maybe you should send this poem to her majesty and have Neri explain it to her if she won't get its meaning.
A lot of legal jargon has been used in the news. . .but one term has always been highlighted to justify the concealment of information on JPEPA, quid pro quos, "something for something". A senator has kept on saying that the details of the agreement, even if not divulged, are quite simply a bundle of favors (sic) to the government. But, as a matter of right to information, shouldn't these quid pro quos be dealt with transparently. To quote one statesman, "baka binebenta na pati kaluluwa natin!". Aren't such fears be valid in these times where the President has repeatedly committed grave abuses of discretion prior to JPEPA to warrant utmost transparency in the dealings of the government in days to come? Shouldn't the Supreme Court, the last remaining institution standing as a vanguard of justice, be vigilant in checking the actions of the President? What is more disconcerting on the two SC decisions on executive privilege is that the Chief Justice's judgment is relegated to a mere dissent. How come? How come?
Deux,
Your lament is certainly a reflection of ours. If there is anything that redeems us from desperation,it is the fact that there are still justices who have the courage to dissent when it is consistent with justice. I am glad that our Chief Justice dissented in the two controversial cases, although that is a credit that goes to him and not to the Supreme Court.
Really, when even the courts are with them, where does it lead us? I certainly cannot say.
Thanks for visiting.
Yeah, the recent SC decisions have been very disappointing. The justices are reaching that point where they're just rubber stamping everything that Gloria does. Parang SC noong panahon ni Macoy.
Bill, oo nga. Kaso mas masahol ngayon than Macoy's time. At least during Macoy's time, the Supreme Court had rendered decisions that displeased the President.
Post a Comment